Feed on
Posts
Comments

Our Future

slide_632_12887_largeIf PRESIDENT-ELECT Obama treats this country with half as much respect, care and honor as he does with his family, we are all in for a positive four (hopefully eight) years.

It’s obvious and expected that Barack Obama and Joe Biden’s administration will be faced with extremely difficult decisions in the coming months and likely the coming years. The part we should all keep in mind is that this administration is NOT the solution to all the issues this country faces.

What it really is - a fresh, new, diverse and highly-educated group of people that more than half of America believes can change the direction we are currently headed. Give it about six months and the other half will come around when they realize it’s okay to have a well-rounded, educated, non-white leader who in fact is not a terrorist.

So, here we are…finally looking forward. No more turning back to dwell on the failings of past Presidents or exchange in verbal bashings about personality, age, cost of clothing, middle names, lipstick, pigs, lipstick on pigs…we all remember the long list since it happened so recently.

Now that the decision has been made and we’ve let our voices be heard, what ONE question would you ask Mr. Obama as the 44th elected President of the United States?

For me, I imagine something like this. I would proudly and nervously shake his hand, look him straight in the eyes and ask him this question: “Mr. President-elect, now that you have truly made history and successfully earned the position and title of Commander in Chief, President and leader of this country, do you have buyer’s remorse? Because, sir, I believe I might if I were you.”

Survival of the Bigots

Right when we think we’re making real progress in America, it becomes painfully obvious that there are still an alarming number of people in this country who see only in color.

After all this time and such a painful history to get us here, how are there still bigots in this country? And, why?

The topic of “race” has been somewhat hush-hush for most of this particular Presidential “race,” which is either impressively progressive of us or makes us completely naive. No matter which way you slice it or dice it, Barack Obama brings a historical twist to this election, and that twist is race.

It’s not just because he’s part African-American but also because he’s from Hawaii (not Arkansas or Texas) and has an incredibly diverse background filled with people who make others pretty uncomfortable. He’s not the typical Anglo-American, decorated war veteran candidate we’re used to seeing vie for the White House. And, judging by the fact that some of the most historically AWFUL Presidents of the U.S. were, um, white, perhaps skin color shouldn’t be an influencing factor for voters.

There’s been a shift over the last few weeks with media outlets beginning to dive into the race discussion - beyond the whole “Obama’s playing the race card to win the election” bit.

One of the most fascinating articles floating around this topic is one from George Packer in the newest issue of The New Yorker.  He interviewed a wide-range of quintessential “middle Americans” in Ohio about the election and without any real prompt, race came up. So did poll numbers.

From The New Yorker:

“Andrew Kohut, of the Pew Research Center, published an Op-Ed in the Times about the failure of polls to predict the outcome, particularly when one of the candidates is not white. He wrote about a theory that polls do not detect racism among working-class whites. Hillary Clinton beat Obama among whites with family incomes under fifty thousand dollars and also among those who didn’t attend college. ‘Poorer, less well-educated white people refuse surveys more often than affluent, better-educated whites,’ Kohut wrote. ‘Polls generally adjust their samples for this tendency. But here’s the problem: these whites who do not respond to surveys tend to have more unfavorable views of blacks than respondents who do the interviews.’ This statistical glitch is different from the Bradley Effect, named for the black mayor of Los Angeles, Tom Bradley, who lost the California governorship in 1982 despite polls that had showed him in the lead, apparently because a small percentage of respondents would rather lie to a pollster than admit to opposing a candidate on the ground of his race.’ Still, the Bradley Effect and the Kohut Lacuna produce the same conclusion: a black candidate is likely to fare worse than preëlection polls would suggest.”

As Obama’s prelimanary poll numbers continue to rise and McCain’s are headed down the toilet (perhaps his best friend Joe can help him out) be prepared for a closer race than what the national polls predict. This is all the more reason to vote and make sure your voice gets counted. Unless of course you are racist, then do this country a favor and stay at home on November 4th.

 

Palin practicing for VP debate

On the eve of what feels like Christmas, Rosh Hashana and New Year’s all wrapped into one, everyone from the politico pundits to recently registered voters are having a holiday all-their-own preparing for the Palin/Biden VP debate Thursday night. 

Beyond the traditional, “debatable” questions and issues most candidates face when they go head to head during a debate, there will be MUCH more going on in that room.

With predictions of embarrassing failure, impressive success and simply going mute, Palin has a lot to live up to no matter how you look at it.

Her performance runs far deeper than whether or not she can name ONE other Supreme Court ruling than Roe v. Wade, or if she knows what the Bush Doctrine is, or what John McCain actually does as a “reformer”, or what she would be doing as VP, or the name of a publication she reads.

Come on people, back off! Why is everyone (namely media) harassing Sarah Palin with all of these trick questions? How dare you.

Oh, wait, that’s right…because she’s looking to us for her votes. And, we obviously can’t “vote” for someone we don’t really know or understand their beliefs and politics. Right? 

Wrong. This is America. We can all go vote for WHOEVER we want, based on WHATEVER reasons we want - no matter how illogical or irrelevant.

So, as I’ve recently had the pleasure of reading and hearing, some voters are choosing the Palin ticket based on really awesome things like - her religion, her personal life and interests (i.e., hunting), her adorable accent, and her personality in general. 

Don’t let this be misleading - people in the blue parts of the country have a lot of the same reasons for voting Obama. However, this is my very point. Over the last few months it’s become apparent that people are more focused on who they “like” better than who is actually “fit” to lead our nation. 

It is commonly known that personality or “popularity” is far more important than say, brains or knowledge in high school or in the Kappa Kappa Gamma’s of American Universities. It is however, less commonly discussed that those same rules apply in politics. 

As we’ve all seen before - in the original (good) episodes of 90210 or perhaps in real life - the “Frat President” isn’t always the sharpest tool in the shed. They win people over with their personality, wit and tendency to conform. It’s not about what they will do to make your cafeteria food better or how they will raise money for the football team - it’s about their ability to attract attention. In school, attention equals popularity. Is politics so different? 

I wouldn’t be so quick to judge Palin, McCain or the Republican Party on their ridiculousness (which it absolutely is) because you can’t get more ridiculous than George W. Bush. He was in this same position for EIGHT long years with an incredibly high approval rating in the early days, and his entire election - both times - was based purely on personality. It clearly wasn’t based on his knowledge. 

In the words of Governor Palin about recent criticisms, ”Oh, I think they’re just not used to someone coming in from the outside saying you know what? It’s time that normal Joe six-pack American is finally represented in the position of vice presidency, and I think that that’s kind of taken some people off guard, and they’re out of sorts, and they’re ticked off about it.” 

“Out of sorts.” Yeah, you could say that.

Poor John McCain. He just can’t seem to catch a break when it comes to responding accurately (or timely) to the current economic situation.

It all started with the “fall” of AIG, when McCain made claims that our “economy was still strong” as he continued to campaign last week.

Less than one week later, he pulls a complete 180 and asks that the campaign be suspended because of how “serious” the current economic issues are. The Obama camp says “no way Jose” and the debate goes on…as we all know.

McCain’s group then decides to go ahead and call a “win” for John McCain’s performance at the debate. BEFORE IT EVEN STARTED.

Today (Monday), McCain decided to take credit for the “winning” bailout plan hours before it failed and the stock market plumeted more than 700 points. Doh! So close.

At least McCain didn’t further embarass himself by publicly bashing Obama for anything right before his brilliant plan failed…

“I’ve never been afraid of stepping in to solve problems for the American people, and I’m not going to stop now,” McCain told a rally in Columbus, Ohio. “Sen. Obama took a very different approach to the crisis our country faced. At first he didn’t want to get involved. Then he was monitoring the situation.”
McCain, grinning, flashed a sarcastic thumbs up. 

“That’s not leadership. That’s watching from the sidelines,” he added to cheers and applause. 

You really do start to feel pretty bad for the guy. With Palin out and about spewing all sorts of Saturday Night Live material on national television, you have to believe that McCain just wants to say, “Screw it. I give up my friends.”

Of course, we all know that will NEVER happen. But it is fun to watch the poll numbers continue to grow in Obama’s favor. Keep it up Senator Maverick, we can’t wait to see what crazy stunt you’ll pull next!

Democrats Kryptonite

Friday night’s official kick-off to debate season had its fair share of highlights, no doubt, but overall proved to be pretty uneventful.

It became obvious there was no real winner of the debate before it was even over. However, according to a national poll, Obama was favored 49% to McCain’s 44%, so if there really is a “winner” of these debates - congrats to Obama. 

Both candidates had their strong moments and their weak moments. Senator McCain flat out made stuff up or embellished points that Senator Obama had to then refute.

On the flip side, Obama said the words “I agree” or “John is absolutely right” far more than he should have. And, in classic form, the McCain camp has already created the ad below to capture those moments. 

 

For as long as I can remember, the Democrats have struggled with something that Republicans never have (and likely never will). The Kryptonite of the Democratic Party seems to be nothing more than pure “open mindedness.” It seems like that shouldn’t be a negative thing, but in a race for the White House, it absolutely is. It’s unfortunate that it comes down to this, but with time ticking away, agreement with McCain or the Republican party is not the way to go right now. 

Throughout the debate, there’s no doubt that Obama actually did “agree” with McCain on a few of his points, but that doesn’t mean he should admit that during the first debate out of the box. The Republicans (McCain in this instance) will NOT EVER publicly admit they agree with one iota of what the Democrats say. And, for years upon years, this has worked.

During the hour and a half debate, McCain never once looked at Obama, which is not necessarily a positive thing, but it certainly didn’t scream, “I agree with you.”

This last year, Obama has done a better job of standing on his own, unique, Democratic platform than say, Kerry in 2004 or even Gore in 2000, but with only five weeks remaining until decision day, it’s time for the Democrats to be as bull-headed as the Republicans…and continue to say, “ENOUGH.” 

The best quote of the debate came from Senator Obama just after Senator McCain wrapped up his supposed-to-be-sappy story about the mom who gave him a bracelet for her son who served in the war (which is absolutely honorable but not necessary to bring up). Obama responded with, “I have a bracelet too.” I laughed out loud - which I didn’t think was possible during a Presidential debate without G.W. 

All in all, it was fun to see the two go head to head, especially after the possibility of it not even happening. Plus, as history has typically proven, less exciting debates have turned into nail-biting elections.

This, of course, does not factor in the much anticipated VP debate coming up because we all know that will be entertaining…if not purely comedic.

Wanted to follow up to the post below with this video, courtesy of Jon Stewart’s The Daily Show. A great visual representation of just how serious we should take our President’s “urgent request.”

Smarty Pants Strikes Again

What with the Republicans banning the press and all…it’s been too long since we’ve witnessed Palin’s impressive on-camera skills.  

Thank you Katie Couric for reminding us all just how qualified (and entertaining) Palin really is. 

What I learned today about Governor Palin from this recent interview:

- She’s not quite sure what the hell Maverick McCain has been doing for the last 26 years in Congress. Get in line lady. 

- She disregards those pesky “poll numbers.” 

- She still thinks since she can see Putin bathing from her living room, she has Foreign Policy experience.

- Her media training has improved a little. She moved away from the whole “we’re best friends bit” she did during the Charles Gibson interview by starting every single sentence with “Ya know Charlie…” She refrained from compulsively saying “Katie” or “Kat” or “K-Dawg” throughout the interview. Great article about her new life in the limelight and what professional media trainers think.  http://www.slate.com/id/2200937/

- Either she really does have a cone head or she teases her hair days in advance to get it to stand up like that.

- This whole thing is really just a scam to get Americans to like the state of Alaska and finally admit that it’s somewhat important. 

 

From the same party that brought us good ol’ WMD and the Iraq War, the Fear Campaigning is in full motion. 

Yesterday was a day full of positive messages from President Bush, Senator McCain and Governor Palin. During Bush’s speech last night, I was shocked to actually hear him talk negatively about our economy (he’s never done) but then I got to thinking - what does he care at this point?

Plus, I’m sorry to be the jaded American here - but who actually still believes one word that comes out of that man’s mouth?

 ”The entire economy is in danger. Without immediate action by Congress, America could slip into a financial panic and a distressing scenario would unfold,” said Bush. “Ultimately, our country could experience a long and painful recession. … We must not let this happen.”

Just a month and a half ago, Bush called the economy “completely sound.”

Obviously, a lot has happened in a month - but really? All the sudden, we’re in “great danger, distress and panic?”

My only question is this - are those types of messages necessary or is this notorious fear-inducing Republican party saying these things to not only scare Americans but also to distract from the election and now the debate?

It’s just so hard to keep up with this whiplash messaging from Senator McCain lately. Last Thursday, after the AIG fiasco, the economy was “stong” and now, we should be preparing for “another Great Depression.” Is it just me, or are we being scared into submission once again?

Seemingly simple concepts like common sense, multi-tasking and oh…the Constitution have become a debate all their own for the “McCailin” campaign.

They tried to call off the first election debate (didn’t work) and are simply saying “thanks, but no thanks” to the freedom of the press. McCain seems to think he, Obama and the Prez can solve our economic woes over the weekend. I feel much better.

“I am confident that before the markets open on Monday we can achieve consensus on legislation that will stabalize our financial markets, protect taxpayers and homeowners, and earn the confidence of the American people. All we must do to achieve this is temporarily set politics aside, and I am committed to doing so.”

Of course, in McCain’s official comment about “why” he wants to postpone the debate, he brought up September 11 AGAIN to remind us AGAIN that it happened and we should be scared and “trust Washington.”

We need this debate to happen on Friday. We Americans are thirsty for more from both candidates and it’s only getting closer to Nov. 4. More than 18 percent of this country is undecided right now and in a tight race like this one, that will undoubtedly mean a win for either candidate.

Oh, and if you thought he cancelled his interview with David Letterman last night to go begin his quest to “save our country…” not so much. You would have found him on Katie Couric’s couch telling her all about the inevitable demise of our economy.

Thank you Senator McCain for the warm, calming bed-time story. I’m just glad you have a new one this time…that POW one was getting a little repetitive.

If you saw last week’s Saturday Night Live, you know where I’m going with this. If not, here’s the link. 

As with most SNL skits, they are hilarious because of how frighteningly accurate they are. This one brilliantly points out how absurd all of these campaign ads are - specifically picking on McCain, but is true for both sides of the madness.

Our nation’s healthcare issue has naturally been overshadowed by our recent economic pains, but should not be over-looked by Americans right now. Part two of the Mortgage Crisis is without a doubt going to be a Healthcare Crisis and it’s coming fast and furiously.

I will be the first to admit that “Universal Healthcare” sounds like a lot of work and will likely cost me a few dollars here and there to make it happen. But, is that a bad thing?

For those of you who can’t get past the “few dollars here and there” part - let me ask you this: have you ever given a homeless person a few bucks because you felt bad, or donated money to a cause or charity because you believed in it, or tithed at Church to support it? If yes, then please tell me what the difference is between that (and any other “donation”) and contributing to a healthcare system that might actually work for a lot more people than the sad system we have today.

I’ve heard nothing but negative overtones from Republicans about how awful Universal Healthcare would be and that it will “never work.” Maybe. Maybe not. But, at this point, why not try?

About a year and a half ago, San Francisco (Mayor Gavin Newsom) said, “Hey Washington, you can suck it. We’re going to try this Universal Healthcare thing and see what happens.”

Being a resident of the city, I’ll tell you that I’ve noticed the extra $2.48 labeled at the bottom of my bar receipt, and thought “wow - there it is. I’m actually contributing to the cost of someone else’s healthcare.”

Here’s why I quickly get over it though: that measly $2.48 is a joke compared to the hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars I’ve probably spent on taxes over the last five years on really useful things like - politician’s “personal chef’s”, or gazillion-dollar fighter jets that have never been used except that time GW used it to blow some shit up at the ranch.

In a perfect world, these social systems - like healthcare and education - should be governed on a state-level rather than coming from the big boys at the White House.

The success of the “Healthy San Francisco” city-wide healthcare program speaks for itself. Over half of the 60,000 un-insured residents are now covered with basic healthcare under the city’s plan. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gavin-newsom/halfway-to-universal-heal_b_128644.html

Plus, if our government has $80 billion lying around to bail out companies that get “saved” because they are so big (and clearly so bad at business) that the whole world would just implode if they actually went bankrupt…then we can afford to invest in our own health. Right?

Uh, please don’t hate us.

According to a recent BBC poll, other countries in the world apparently don’t love us as much as we love ourselves.

“America’s global image has suffered in recent years. A BBC World Service Poll earlier this year showed that an average of 49 per cent of people in countries surveyed have a negative view of US influence in the world compared to 32 per cent who view it positively.”

Okay, so half the world isn’t “in favor of us…” Are we really that shocked by that? No. The other non-shocking part of this poll is that across the globe, guess who the people outside of our borders think should be our next President? I’ll give you a hint - it’s not Ron Paul. (although he was probably a close second)

Yes, it is Obama. “On average 49 per cent prefer Obama to 12 per cent preferring McCain. Nearly four in ten do not take a position.”

That’s quite a few who don’t “take a position,” so of course this study comes with a grain of salt. However, I think it’s important for us to listen to what our NATO allies think of our dueling candidates.

“The countries most optimistic that an Obama presidency would improve relations are America’s NATO allies - Canada (69%), France (62%), Germany (61%), United Kingdom (54%), Italy (64%) - as well as Australia (62%) and the African countries Kenya (87%) and Nigeria (71%).” 

Read everything you can get your hands on about the candidates and what they REALLY stand for. Check this site out which gets a little too detailed, but shows how the candidates voted (or didn’t vote) in years past.  

http://www.votesmart.org/index.htm

If we continue to ignore the real issues in our country and focus our minds on pigs with makeup, Kindergarten sex and hockey moms, be on the lookout for more headlines like this…just replace GW’s face with the POW’s.

 

A total of 22,000 people across the world were polled. More information about the BBC poll can be found here:

http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/home_page/533.php?nid=&id=&pnt=533&lb

Older Posts »